Ranking and being quoted are now two different jobs. Google still rewards depth, structure and topical coverage. Answer engines reward whether a specific passage can be lifted, attributed and trusted. Most content tools optimise for neither, they optimise for word count.
This writer plans the piece around the question first, forces every section to answer before it explains, and then scores the result three ways so you can see exactly which part is weak before you publish.
Where this tool actually helps
Turning one keyword into a real article
Plan an outline that maps each section to a sub-question, approve it, then draft against it instead of prompting a blank page.
Rescuing a post that ranks but is never cited
Paste the topic and facts, compare the AEO score against your live page, then fix the answer blocks and FAQ structure.
Keeping a team's output consistent
Lock the house voice with past samples so five different writers produce drafts with the same cadence.
How to read the result
The SEO score covers the things Google can measure: title and meta length, heading hierarchy, keyword placement rather than keyword count, semantic coverage of your supporting terms, depth against the intent you picked, scannability, linking and authorship signals.
The AEO score is different. It checks whether the opening answers the query in 40 to 60 words, whether headings are shaped like real queries, whether each section answers in its first paragraph, whether claims carry citable figures and sources, whether an FAQ block exists for schema, and how many distinct entities the piece names. The authenticity score is the same stylometric scan used in the LinkedIn writer.
Common mistakes we see
- Opening with why the topic matters. Answer the query in the first paragraph, context comes second.
- Statement headings. 'Pricing considerations' is invisible. 'How much does SEO cost in India?' matches how people ask.
- Burying the answer three paragraphs into a section. Engines lift the first passage under a heading.
- Unsourced numbers. A figure without a source rarely gets quoted and can get the whole page distrusted.
- Skipping the FAQ block. It is the cheapest schema and the most quoted part of most articles.
- Publishing without adding anything only you know. A well-structured summary of the same ten sources is still a summary.
FAQs
- What is the difference between SEO and AEO here?
- SEO scoring looks at how well the page is built to rank: structure, coverage, depth and linking. AEO scoring looks at whether a passage can be extracted, attributed and quoted by an answer engine. A page can score well on one and badly on the other, which is why they are separate.
- Does it invent statistics?
- No. The engine is instructed to use only the facts you supply and to leave a visible [add figure] marker where a number is missing rather than making one up. The outline also lists what only you can provide.
- How long should the article be?
- Set the target by intent. Informational guides usually need around 1,200 words, commercial comparisons around 1,000, transactional pages closer to 700. The depth score compares your draft against the target for the intent you chose.
- Can I use the schema output directly?
- Yes, with one check. Update the URL, published and modified dates to match your CMS, and confirm the FAQ answers still match the published copy after you edit. The FAQPage block only appears when the draft has at least two question headings with answers.
- Does it write in my voice?
- If you paste two or more past pieces, it extracts your sentence length, spread and vocabulary, then constrains the draft to that cadence and scores the drift. Without samples the draft is plainer and more generic.
A note from Nimitt
A tool gives you a number. A person tells you what to do with it. If you want a straight answer on your site, send it over. I read every one myself.